تاثیر دولت الکترونیک بر فساد اقتصادی درکشورهای در حال توسعه‌ی صادرکننده نفت: وجود یا عدم وجود رابطه غیرخطی

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه اقتصاد نظری دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

2 کارشناسی ارشد علوم اقتصادی، گرایش اقتصاد و تجارت الکترونیک، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار گروه اقتصاد بازرگانی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

10.30465/jnet.2025.49013.2144

چکیده

ابتکارات دولت الکترونیک به یک کشور کمک می‌کند تا اطلاعات را با شفافیت و کارایی بیشتر منتشر کند، خدمات عمومی با کیفیت‌تری ارائه کند و گام‌های مهمی برای مبارزه با فساد بردارد. دولت الکترونیک می‌تواند با کاهش نقاط تماس انسانی با استفاده از فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در فرآیندهای دولتی، بهبود امنیت اطلاعاتی و حفاظت از اطلاعات حساس دولتی را فراهم کند و همچنین می‌تواند بهبود کارآیی فرآیندهای دولتی را به همراه داشته باشد که از این طریق می‌تواند به کاهش فساد کمک کند.
این پژوهش به بررسی اثر دولت الکترونیک بر فساد اقتصادی 12 کشور در حال توسعه صادرکننده نفت پرداخته است. بدین منظور از داده‌های ترکیبی در دوره 2012 تا 2021 و از روش اقتصادسنجی مبتنی بر داد‌ه‌های ترکیبی (پنل) استفاده شده است. نتایج حاصل از تخمین نشان داد، رابطه مثبت و معنی‌داری بین شاخص دولت الکترونیک و شاخص ادراک فساد وجود دارد، بدین معنا که الکترونیکی شدن دولت و خدمات آن باعث کاهش سطح فساد در کشورهای مورد مطالعه می‌شود. برای بررسی وجود رابطه غیر خطی از مدل رگرسیون پنل آستانه‌ای (PTR) بهره برده شد و این نتیجه حاصل شد که برای کشورهای در حال توسعه صادرکننده نفت وجود مدل آستانه‌ای به لحاظ آماری معنی‌دار نیست.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The impact of e-government on economic corruption in oil exporting developing countries:

نویسندگان [English]

  • j t 1
  • ali maziki 2
  • Niloofar Anvarniya 3
1 Associate Professor ,Department of Theoretical Economics , Allameh Tabataba'i University of Tehran , Tehran, Iran
2 Master’s in Economic Sciences with a specialization in Economics and E-Commerce, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Economics ,Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

E-government initiatives help a country disseminate information more transparently and efficiently, provide better quality public services, and take important steps to fight corruption. By reducing human contact points by using information and communication technology in government processes, e-government can improve information security and protect sensitive government information, and it can also improve the efficiency of government processes, which can Help reduce corruption.
This research has investigated the effect of e-government on economic corruption in 12 developing countries that export oil. For this purpose, composite data in the period from 2012 to 2021 and the econometric method based on composite data (panel) have been used. The results of the estimation showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between the electronic government index and the corruption perception index, which means that the electronicization of the government and its services reduces the level of corruption in the studied countries. To investigate the existence of a non-linear relationship and to test the hypothesis that the e-government index has a U-shaped effect on the corruption perception index, by using the threshold panel regression (PTR) model, we came to the conclusion that there is a threshold model for oil exporting developing countries.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • E-government
  • corruption
  • information
  • communication
  • technology

مراجع

سلیمانی، پیغامی،  عادل. (2016). مؤلفه‌های الگوی مقاوم‌سازی اقتصادی-اجتماعی جمهوری اسلامی ایران (مطالعه موردی سیاست‌های کلی ابلاغی مقام معظم رهبری). مطالعات راهبردی بسیج, 19(71), 5-29.
فیضی ینگجه، سلیمان, حکمتی فرید, یحیوی میاوقی, صبا. (2017). تأثیر رانت منابع نفتی بر شاخص‌های حکومت‌داری خوب در کشورهای صادرکننده نفت. پژوهش‌های اقتصادی ایران, 22(71), 189-218.
متفکر آزاد, جامه شورانی، حیدری داد. (2014). تاثیر دولت الکترونیکی بر کاهش فساد اقتصادی در گروه کشورهای منتخب اسلامی. فصلنامه علمی مدلسازی اقتصادی, 7(24), 37-51.
خسروانی, عباس. (2018). پیشگیری از فساد سازمانی با تاکید بر دولت الکترونیک. فصلنامه علمی رهیافت پیشگیری از جرم, 1(1), 99-120.
میلانی، علیرضا و اصغر حبیبی (1395)، بررسی رانت در اقتصاد ایران، فصلنامه مطالعـات علوم اجتماعی، 2 (1)، 76-83.
Abu–Shanab, E. A., Harb, Y. A., & Al–Zoubi, S. Y. (2013). E–government as an anti–corruption tool: citizens perceptions. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 6(3), 232-248.
Alam, M. S. (1995) A Theory of Limits on Corruption and Some Applications, Kyklos, 48(3), 419-435.
Anderson, T.B. (2009) E-government as an anti-corruption strategy, Information Economics and Policy, 21, 201−210.
Burguet, R., & Che, Y.-K. (2004). Competitive procurement with corruption. The RAND Journal of Economics, 35(1), 50–68.
Bac, M. (2001). Corruption, connections and transparency: does a better screen imply a better scene? Public Choice, 107(1), 87–96.
Basel Institute on Governance. (2017). New perspectives in e-government and the prevention of corruption, Basel, Switzerland: Basel Institute on Governance Working Paper 23.
Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T. and Grimes, J.M. (2010) Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: e-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societie ,Government Information Quarterly, 27, 264–271.
Bhargava, V. K., & Bolongaita, E. P. (2004). Challenging corruption in Asia: Case studies and a framework for action. World Bank Publications.
Bose, N., Capasso, S., & Murshid, A. P. (2008). Threshold effects of corruption: theory and evidence.World Development, 36(7), 1173–1191.
Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information systems journal, 15(1), 5-25.‏
Charoensukmongkol, P., & Moqbel, M. (2014). Does investment in ICT curb or create more corruption? A cross-country analysis. Public Organization Review, 14, 51-63‏‏.
Chen, A. (2005) Secret societies and organized crime in contemporary China, Modern Asian Studies, 39, 77-107.
Deane, C. (2009). E-Government Anti-Corruption Strategies: Recommendations for Implementation of an E-Records Management System. Available at SSRN 2782504.‏
Delavallade, C. (2006). Corruption and distribution of public spending in developing countries. Journal of Economics and Finance, 30(2), 222–239.
Derindag, O. F., Canakci, M., & Tsarev, R. (2019). Information and communication technologies in e-commerce and e-governance. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1399(3), 033110.
Di John, J. (2010). The ‘resource curse’: Theory and evidence. Elcano Newsletter, 72, 9.
Dhaoui, I. (2022). E-government for sustainable development: Evidence from MENA countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2070-2099.
Delavallade, C. (2006). Corruption and distribution of public spending in developing countries. Journal of economics and finance, 30(2), 222-239.‏
Fjeldstad, Odd-Helge & Heggstad, Kari. (2012). Local Government Revenue Mobilisation in Anglophone Africa. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.2408608.
Garcia-Murillo, M. (2010). The effect of internet access on government corruption. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 7(1), 22-40.
Gu, E., Meng, T., Wang, H., & Zhang, A. (2023). E-government use, perceived transparency, public knowledge of government performance, and satisfaction with government: an analysis of mediating, moderating, and framing mechanisms based on the COVID-19 outbreak control survey data from China. Social Indicators Research, 169(1), 79-124.‏
Gupta, S., de Mello, L., & Sharan, R. (2001). Corruption and military spending. European Journal of Political Economy, 17(4), 749–777.
Goudie, A. W., & Stasavage, D. (1998) A framework for the analysis of corruption, Crime Law and Social Change, 29(2-3), 113-159.
Heeks, R. (2003). Most eGovernment for Development Projects Fail: How can risks be reduced, iGovernment — Information, Systems, Technology, and the Public Sector, Working Paper No. 14, Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester
Heeks, R., & Bhatnagar, S. (1999). Understanding success and failure in information age reform. In R.Heeks (Ed.), Reinventing government in the information age. London: Routledge.
Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and Managing eGovernment: An International Text. 10.4135/9781446220191.
Hellmann, J., Jones, G., Kaufmann, D. (2009). Seize the State, Seize the Day: State Capture, Corruption and Influence in Transition. Washington: World Bank.
‏Jain, A. K. (2001). Corruption: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15 (1), 71-121. DOI 10.1111/1467-6419.00133.
Karl, T. L. (1997). The paradox of plenty: Oil booms and petro-states (Vol. 26). Univ of California Press.‏
Kim, K., & An, J. (2022). Corruption as a Moderator in the Relationship between E-Government and Inward Foreign Direct Investment. Sustainability, 14(9), 4995.
Kui-Wai Li  (2017). Redefining Capitalism in Global Economic Development, Academic Press,
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804181-9.00020-3
Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2009). Is transparency the Key to reducing corruption in resource-rich countries? World Development, 37(3), 521–532.
Lio, M. C., Liu, M. C., & Ou, Y. P. (2011). Can the internet reduce corruption? A cross-country study based on dynamic panel data models. Government information quarterly, 28(1), 47-53.
Linhartová, V. (2017). The role of e-government in mitigating corruption. Scientific papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration. 40/2017.
Li, S., Wei, W., & Ma, M. (2021). How does e-government affect corruption? Provincial panel evidence from China. IEEE Access, 9, 94879-94888.
Lupu, D., & Lazăr, C. G. (2015). Influence of e-government on the level of corruption in some EU and non-EU states. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20, 365-371.
Mauro, P. (1997). Corruption and Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681-712.
Nam, T. (2014). Determining the type of e-government use. Government information quarterly, 31(2), 211-220.‏
OgheneochukoJeko, V. & Okoh, S. N. (2024). evaluation governance and legitimacy deficiencies in sustainable democracy in Niegeria. Journal of African Studies and Sustainable Development. 7(3), 43-60.
Oruame, S. (2008). Corruption is killing ICT in Nigeria, Computerworld Nigeria.
Paarlberg, L. E., & Yoshioka, T. (2016). The impact of local economic structure on community philanthropy. Public Administration Review, 76(2), 340-350.‏
Pathak, R., Naz, R., Rahman, M., Smith, R. and Agarwal, K. (2009) E-governance to cut corruption in public services delivery: a case study of Fiji, Journal of Public Administration, 32, 415–437.‏‏
‏‏‏‏Santiso, C. (2022). Trust with integrity: Harnessing the integrity dividends of digital government for reducing corruption in developing countries.
Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: causes, consequences, scope and cures. International Monetary Fund, Working Paper, 45 (4), 559-591.
Trasparency International (2021). Corruption Perception Index 2020. Berlín: Transparency International.‏
Varavithya, W., & Esichaikul, V. (2006) 'Dealing with discretionary decision making in e-government: an open government approach, Electronic Government, an International Journal, 3(4), 356-372.
Waller, C. J., Verdier, T., & Grdner, R. (2002). Corruption: Top Down or Bottom Up? Economic Inquiry, 40(4), 688-703.
Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of econometrics, 93(2), 345-368.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2021). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 5430.
Kalkamanova, A. (2022). The Language of Legitimation in Authoritarian Regimes: A Multiple-Case Study of Kazakhstan and Russia (Doctoral dissertation, Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem (Hungary)).‏
https://www-hec-edu.translate.goog/en/knowledge/articles/how-e-government-curbs-corruption?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=fa&_x_tr_hl=fa&_x_tr_pto=sc
https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/global-economic-prospects

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 02 خرداد 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 27 مهر 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 20 آذر 1403

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار